Why 2 Photographers Are Better — Here’s Proof
What should you look for in a photographer? A twin. Well, actually, to have TWO photographers. Yes, it costs more. But if you can afford it, it’s much better. Don’t believe me? Well, take a look at a wedding I officiated a few weeks ago.
If you have one photographer, they will get the shot of the bride walking in (Tiger chose to go solo, then all 4 parents — hers and his — joined the bride and groom at the front):
With two photographers, you also get:
The typical kiss shot is like this:
With a second photographer — and the amazing perspective offered by the balcony at Hotel Baker in St. Charles — you also get:
One last example, the first dance, which showcases why it’s called the Rainbow Room — check out the colored floor lights, each one a thick square glass with a light in it:
The balcony view, taken at the same time:
My thanks to the terrific Jason Kaczorowski of Jason Kaczorowski Photography for the images. He had some of these photos on a laptop to show the guests during the reception! See more of his images from their wedding on Jason’s blog.
Read their touching proposal story — she visited the ring daily at the store until one day it was gone — on my blog.
Read about the unity wine they did — the first time I’ve ever done that — on my blog.
Tags: wedding photography
Budget, Photography | Rev. Phil Landers | 
July 31, 2010 9:10 AM
Subscribe